Cadence Design Systems
Combined average of Moat (AI Resilience), Growth, and Valuation scores.
Moat Score
Co-dominant EDA platform with structural lock-in across digital, custom/analog, verification, and system analysis flows used by every advanced chip designer.
Cadence's moat rests on mission-critical design infrastructure that has compounded for 35+ years:
- Verification & Custom/Analog Leadership: Cadence dominates analog/custom design (Virtuoso) and verification (Palladium emulation, Protium prototyping). Hardware emulation systems sell for $10–50M each and lock customers into multi-year refresh cycles; Q2 2026 was another record hardware quarter, with 12 new customers and hyperscaler expansions.
- Disciplined Bolt-On M&A vs Synopsys's Mega-Deal: Where Synopsys is digesting its ~$35B Ansys acquisition (closed July 2025), Cadence has bought focused, integratable assets — Hexagon's Design & Engineering business (~$3.16B, closed Feb 2026) for multiphysics, Secure-IC (Nov 2025) for embedded security IP, plus BETA CAE — and Q2 still printed Core EDA +18% organic, IP +40%, and System Design & Analysis +37% (Hexagon in the mix).
- Cadence.AI Agentic Design Suite: ChipStack, ViraStack, InnoStack, and the July 2026 AuraStack Super Agent (advanced packaging and PCB) extend agentic design across the full electronic-system flow — trained on telemetry from thousands of tape-outs, lifting tool intensity and ASP per design as AI-chip complexity escalates.
Moat Verdict
Cadence's moat is highly AI-resilient: AI-silicon proliferation increases EDA tool intensity rather than disrupting it, and the Super Agent suite (now including AuraStack for packaging and PCB) turns Cadence's tape-out data advantage into an agentic-design product. The duopoly with Synopsys is structurally protected by tape-out risk aversion, foundry certification cycles, and decades of accumulated methodology IP. The main non-AI risk is geopolitical — the on/off China EDA export controls, now against a 15% China mix — which caps regulatory lock-in rather than the underlying design moat.
82.9 resilient · 71.0 vulnerable · 80/20 = 80.5 · = 80
Open a moat to read its note.
Cadence sells specialised engineering software and emulation hardware, not consumer UI experiences.
Decades of accumulated verification methodologies, place-and-route algorithms, and signoff rules encode chip design IP that AI cannot independently replicate.
Cadence does not derive moat from public data access.
EDA architects, verification methodology experts, and emulation hardware engineers are extraordinarily scarce; Cadence's R&D embeds 30+ years of accumulated know-how.
The full flow (digital, analog/custom, verification, emulation hardware, IP, system analysis) is tightly integrated, but Synopsys sells an equivalent full flow, so the bundle raises switching cost without being one competitors cannot match. Re-rated from strong to intact in the proof-point pass.
Tape-out telemetry trains the Super Agents, but the designs belong to customers and Synopsys trains on the same kind of data; scale of customer data is not uniqueness (same bar as Snowflake). Re-rated from strong to intact in the proof-point pass.
EDA has no positive regulatory moat. The US China EDA export curbs (imposed May 2025, rescinded July 2025) and the 2025 DOJ/BIS settlement are regulatory risk, charged in the growth keyRisk rather than scored here as an eroded moat. Previously weakened.
A three-sided lock between foundries, EDA vendors and chip designers: TSMC, Samsung and Intel certify Cadence and its duopoly peer's reference flows for each new node first, designers need certified flows to tape out, and a third vendor cannot get certified early enough to matter. That loop is why Cadence and Synopsys together hold roughly 60–70% of the EDA market and Siemens EDA has stayed a distant third for decades. Distinct from the tape-out switching cost rated under transactionEmbedding.
Every advanced chip tape-out passes through Cadence verification, signoff or IP, and switching mid-program risks slips worth tens of millions. The lock is structural: Cadence and Synopsys together hold roughly 60–70% of the EDA market, with Siemens EDA a distant third, and foundry certification cycles keep it that way.
Virtuoso design databases and verification environments hold design history, but that lock is the tape-out embedding already rated strong under transactionEmbedding, and design data moves through open formats (OpenAccess, GDSII). Re-rated from strong to intact so one fact is not scored twice.
Software at near-zero marginal cost: scale shows up as network effects, data or bundling, which are rated there. No separate unit-cost lead to credit.
Buyers are enterprises choosing on switching cost, integration and performance, which the other pillars rate. The name carries reputation, not a price premium it could hold on brand alone.
Combined average of Moat (AI Resilience), Growth, and Valuation scores.
Moat Score
Co-dominant EDA platform with structural lock-in across digital, custom/analog, verification, and system analysis flows used by every advanced chip designer.
Growth Score
Q2 2026 revenue of $1.584B (+24% YoY) beat the prior-quarter run-rate, with Core EDA +18%, IP +40% (Intel Star IP plus other semiconductor wins), and System Design & Analysis +37% (PCB, advanced packaging, Hexagon D&E). Management raised FY2026 guidance to $6.26–6.34B (~19% YoY at the midpoint), non-GAAP operating margin 43.75–44.75% (mid 44.25%), non-GAAP EPS $8.05–8.15 (mid $8.10), and operating cash flow of $2B. Record backlog is $8.1B ($4.2B converting within 12 months). Q3 is guided $1.595–$1.625B revenue (1–3% q/q, 19–21% y/y; CFO commentary Exhibit 99.02) and non-GAAP EPS $2.01–2.07. The 15–18% blended CAGR is held: the printed year is 19%, Core EDA +18% is the organic tell, and IP/SDA rates include Hexagon (closed Feb 2026) so they are not the multi-year base.
Valuation Score
Re-marked at the $326.13 close on September 25, 2026 (the last IM25 mark before the rebalance): 78 on the unchanged $270 / $390 / $500 ladder, from 80 at the $319 reference the text below was written at. Only the price moved; the ladder and the thesis are not re-underwritten here. At ~$319 (Friday August 21, 2026 close), CDNS trades at ~39× forward P/E on FY2026 non-GAAP EPS guidance of ~$8.10 — cheaper than the ~46× / ~$365 print on the July 18 card, after the stock sold off while the company raised the year. The stock sits well below the ~$404 consensus 12-month target and in the lower half of its ~$263–$417 52-week range. The EDA duopoly, 78/22 recurring mix (TTM 79%), $8.1B backlog, and FY26E Rule of 40 Metric ~63% still underwrite a premium multiple; the raise plus the derating is what moved the valuation score, not a change in the scenario ladder ($270 / $390 / $500 held).
The EDA Duopoly Moat
Cadence's moat rests on mission-critical design infrastructure that has compounded for 35+ years:
- Verification & Custom/Analog Leadership: Cadence dominates analog/custom design (Virtuoso) and verification (Palladium emulation, Protium prototyping). Hardware emulation systems sell for $10–50M each and lock customers into multi-year refresh cycles; Q2 2026 was another record hardware quarter, with 12 new customers and hyperscaler expansions.
- Disciplined Bolt-On M&A vs Synopsys's Mega-Deal: Where Synopsys is digesting its ~$35B Ansys acquisition (closed July 2025), Cadence has bought focused, integratable assets — Hexagon's Design & Engineering business (~$3.16B, closed Feb 2026) for multiphysics, Secure-IC (Nov 2025) for embedded security IP, plus BETA CAE — and Q2 still printed Core EDA +18% organic, IP +40%, and System Design & Analysis +37% (Hexagon in the mix).
- Cadence.AI Agentic Design Suite: ChipStack, ViraStack, InnoStack, and the July 2026 AuraStack Super Agent (advanced packaging and PCB) extend agentic design across the full electronic-system flow — trained on telemetry from thousands of tape-outs, lifting tool intensity and ASP per design as AI-chip complexity escalates.
Moat Verdict
Cadence's moat is highly AI-resilient: AI-silicon proliferation increases EDA tool intensity rather than disrupting it, and the Super Agent suite (now including AuraStack for packaging and PCB) turns Cadence's tape-out data advantage into an agentic-design product. The duopoly with Synopsys is structurally protected by tape-out risk aversion, foundry certification cycles, and decades of accumulated methodology IP. The main non-AI risk is geopolitical — the on/off China EDA export controls, now against a 15% China mix — which caps regulatory lock-in rather than the underlying design moat.
82.9 resilient · 71.0 vulnerable · 80/20 = 80.5 · = 80
Open a moat to read its note.
Cadence sells specialised engineering software and emulation hardware, not consumer UI experiences.
Decades of accumulated verification methodologies, place-and-route algorithms, and signoff rules encode chip design IP that AI cannot independently replicate.
Cadence does not derive moat from public data access.
EDA architects, verification methodology experts, and emulation hardware engineers are extraordinarily scarce; Cadence's R&D embeds 30+ years of accumulated know-how.
The full flow (digital, analog/custom, verification, emulation hardware, IP, system analysis) is tightly integrated, but Synopsys sells an equivalent full flow, so the bundle raises switching cost without being one competitors cannot match. Re-rated from strong to intact in the proof-point pass.
Tape-out telemetry trains the Super Agents, but the designs belong to customers and Synopsys trains on the same kind of data; scale of customer data is not uniqueness (same bar as Snowflake). Re-rated from strong to intact in the proof-point pass.
EDA has no positive regulatory moat. The US China EDA export curbs (imposed May 2025, rescinded July 2025) and the 2025 DOJ/BIS settlement are regulatory risk, charged in the growth keyRisk rather than scored here as an eroded moat. Previously weakened.
A three-sided lock between foundries, EDA vendors and chip designers: TSMC, Samsung and Intel certify Cadence and its duopoly peer's reference flows for each new node first, designers need certified flows to tape out, and a third vendor cannot get certified early enough to matter. That loop is why Cadence and Synopsys together hold roughly 60–70% of the EDA market and Siemens EDA has stayed a distant third for decades. Distinct from the tape-out switching cost rated under transactionEmbedding.
Every advanced chip tape-out passes through Cadence verification, signoff or IP, and switching mid-program risks slips worth tens of millions. The lock is structural: Cadence and Synopsys together hold roughly 60–70% of the EDA market, with Siemens EDA a distant third, and foundry certification cycles keep it that way.
Virtuoso design databases and verification environments hold design history, but that lock is the tape-out embedding already rated strong under transactionEmbedding, and design data moves through open formats (OpenAccess, GDSII). Re-rated from strong to intact so one fact is not scored twice.
Software at near-zero marginal cost: scale shows up as network effects, data or bundling, which are rated there. No separate unit-cost lead to credit.
Buyers are enterprises choosing on switching cost, integration and performance, which the other pillars rate. The name carries reputation, not a price premium it could hold on brand alone.
Growth Analysis
Growth Drivers
Key Risk
The US rescinded its May 2025 China EDA export curbs in July 2025; the FY26 raise assumes those rules stay substantially similar. Re-imposition remains live. China was 15% of Q2 2026 revenue (13% in Q1; 9% in Q2 2025). A renewed ban on advanced-node Chinese designers would cut a low-teens share of sales with limited near-term offset, pressuring FY2027 growth toward 12% and compressing the multiple. July 2025 DOJ/BIS settlement obligations are still in force.
Score Derivation
81.0 base + 4.0 trajectory + 4 margin − 5 risk = 84
Base ~81 (15–18% blended CAGR, mid 16.5% — FY26 guide now 19% at the midpoint, decayed toward a mid-teens terminal) + 4 all-segment accelerating (Core EDA +18%, IP +40%, SDA +37% in Q2) + 4 margin expansion (Q2 non-GAAP OM 45.5%; FY mid 44.25%; FY26E Rule of 40 Metric ~63%) − 5 China re-restriction risk = 84. The prior derivation string added a deleted +3 TAM term and read 87; the formula never did.
Price Scenarios (12–24 Months)
Valuation Multiples
| Trailing P/E (GAAP) | ~63× |
| Forward P/E (NTM) | ~39× |
| PEG Ratio | ~2.1× |
| Price / Sales (NTM) | ~14× |
| Price / OCF | ~44× |
At ~39× forward P/E, CDNS still screens as a premium compounder, but the multiple compressed from ~46× on the July 18 card as the stock fell from ~$365 to ~$319 while FY26 EPS was raised to ~$8.10. PEG ~2.1× and ~14× NTM sales are full, not distressed; the $8.1B backlog and 44%+ non-GAAP margin underwrite the premium. The valuation score moved because spot cheapened inside an unchanged $270 / $390 / $500 corridor, not because the corridor was rewritten.
Approximate figures as of August 2026.
Where We Are vs Targets
Loading live price…
US re-imposes China EDA curbs; AI-capex digestion slows hyperscaler in-house silicon programs; emulation hardware refresh delays push out revenue and the multiple de-rates toward the low-30s.
- US BIS reinstates the export restrictions it lifted in July 2025 and extends them to all China advanced-node designers, eliminating a low-teens share of Cadence revenue (China was 15% of Q2 2026) with limited 12-month geographic offset
- AI hyperscaler capex digestion slows custom-silicon programs (Google TPU, Meta MTIA, AWS Trainium), deferring Palladium and Protium emulation-hardware orders after a record Q2 hardware quarter
- FY2026 revenue misses the raised $6.26–6.34B guide and the forward multiple compresses toward ~33× on FY2026 EPS ~$8.10 as growth reverts toward 12%
FY2026 lands inside the raised $6.26–6.34B / $8.05–8.15 guide; backlog holds near $8.1B; Core EDA stays mid-teens organic; Cadence.AI and Hexagon-aided SDA keep wallet share as AI-tool intensity rises.
- FY2026 revenue hits ~$6.30B with non-GAAP operating margin near 44% (FY26E Rule of 40 Metric ~63%), delivering non-GAAP EPS of ~$8.10 and validating the July 27 raise
- Record $8.1B backlog is sustained as new AI-accelerator programs (NVIDIA Rubin ecosystem, AMD MI400, hyperscaler ASICs, Intel Star IP) sign multi-year tool and IP licenses
- FY2027 revenue guidance of ~$7.2–7.5B with EPS ~$9.50 issued at year-end, supported by Super Agent adoption and 3D-IC analysis demand, holding the multiple near ~41× forward
AI-silicon proliferation drives EDA tool intensity ~2× per design; Cadence wins share at 2nm/1.4nm verification during Synopsys's Ansys integration; emulation cycle extends and the multiple expands toward ~52× forward.
- 3D-IC packaging and chiplet adoption push Cadence.AI and System Design & Analysis toward 25%+ growth as multiphysics + silicon integration becomes a standard tape-out requirement; AuraStack becomes a default packaging flow
- Cadence captures advanced-node verification share from Synopsys during the multi-year Ansys integration window, lifting organic Core EDA growth above 18%
- Operating margin expands toward 47% by FY2027 as recurring-revenue mix and agentic-AI productivity tools re-rate the multiple toward best-in-class software peers